July 27, 2007

  •                                 Celebrity  +'s  and  -'s

      Minus one....

    After Lindsey Lohan serves her time, conquers her demons and, hopefully, gains a little gravitas, she can gather together all her fellow demon-fighting actresses(Winona Ryder, Courtney Love),singers(Brittney Spears, L'il Kim), and famous-for-their-DNA(Paris Hilton, Nicole Ritchie), and do a re-make of some old women-in-prison flick, like Caged Heat, Amazon Jail, Women in Cages, etc. Macy Gray could play the crazy-but-wise old con, and Queen Latifah the stern-but-wise-and-warm-and-stop-hyphenating-all-the-adjectives -it-is-an-over-used-gimmick.

    Minus Two......

    I know that Michael Vick is innocent-until-proven-guilty(N'yah-n'yah!), but someone was fighting those dogs. And we are free to imagine the court sentencing the convicted Falcon felon, let's call him Michael V., to be thrown into a ring with a bunch of  pit-bulls.  These poor bastards have been psychologically scarred as well, and must be destroyed, so let them  take out the human garbage before they go.

    Big A+

                                      Get down, Al, get down!

                                                  

                                                                    Former future  president, Al Gore,
                                                                 bounces to the Red Hot Chili Peppers

    On the Celebrity+ list, kudos to all the acts that performed at the Live Earth events. Despite the lack of media attention, plenty of people saw that you care. I witnessed some very  passionate performances via the live coverage of the event on the Sundance Channel. Click here for a link to some video.

    + or -, you decide

     

     Um, Tom ? Tone it down a bit, ok?       There, you nailed it!

    So Germany won't let Tom Cruise film his latest movie on their military bases? They won't co-operate on a movie about the evils of persecuting a people based on their religious beliefs, because of Mr. Cruise' religious beliefs. Sounds like they've learned a lot.    *  Well, if Tom needs to film against a background of grim, authoritarian military might, maybe he can co-ordinate with the next Bush photo-op. 

     

     

    *Warning- cheap, political pot-shot to follow.

     

Comments (2)

  • Now, this is not related to dogfighting..... I just decided to post it HERE instead of down below, so as to have a better chance of being seen and not overlooked.

    About the Ark......

    First, I have to ask you why you would presume that any pitch would remain on the surviving timbers. That substance is not forever, you know. Neither is creosote, the modern version. Just look at some of the aging telephone poles out there, and you can see black creosote on the bottom, fading to pure wood at the top. And this is in the span of just a couple of decades. So why would pitch NOT be equally weathered in the span of a couple of thousand years?

    But the bigger querstion is this: by disproving the remains of the ark via your methodology, you also acknowlege that perhaps it WAS an ark! Just poorly built, to be fair.....but what else could that pile of timber atop a mountain BE? It didn't grow there.....so how did it get there, and for what purpose? Your detective work is not over on this, Greg- it is just begun, I would think. Your answers have provided new questions that also beg answers! And I, for one, am curious.......

  • I know when ANY of my posts have been commented on, Sir!

    I do not say that it is a wooden thingie up there, others say it. Others that cannot get close enough to confirm it. Which is my main point; that if no one can get to the supposed ark, how could a bunch of flatlanders, human and otherwise, get away from it?

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment